Home News Tech Update White Papers Downloads Reviews & Prices

Hardwareаа|аа Softwareаа|аа Securityаа|аа Commentaryаа|аа All Newsаа|аа All Videosаа|аа Alertsаа|ааrss feed




NewsаSoftware

Poll: E-voters not so afraid of election-day hacks
By John Borland
CNET News.com
August 3, 2004, 3:57 PM PT
TalkBack!аAdd your opinion

A new set of polls suggests that high-tech security experts have significantly less confidence in the security and accuracy of e-voting tools than does the public at large.

The polls, taken by the Poneman Institute, separately surveyed ordinary people and a much smaller group of researchers at the recent Defcon computer security conference. The public survey was large enough to be scientific, while the Defcon survey was not, but differences in opinion were large enough to draw some broad conclusions, anyway, the researchers said.

A dominant 81 percent of security professionals at Defcon said they had "no confidence or little confidence" in the "security and reliability" of e-voting machines, but just 25 percent of the general public said they had similarly strong reservations, and their main concern was voters' reaction to the machines, not the devices' integrity.


Click Here.

Despite the apparent vote of confidence from the public, Poneman Institute Chief Larry Poneman said policymakers should still be very careful before depending on e-voting systems this fall. Even if ordinary voters aren't terribly worried now, the concerns of security professionals could filter down and ultimately undermine the credibility of election results, or even dissuade people from voting, he said.

"The technology may or may not be good," Poneman said. "But to the extent that people might change their voting patterns based on (their perceptions of) this technology, that could change the outcome."

The security of e-voting has been an increasingly contentious issue over the past year, as electoral policymakers seek to avoid the chaos of the 2000 election in Florida.

Proponents say electronic ballot machines are accurate and are more fair to the disabled and to people facing ballots in an unfamiliar language. Opponents say the machines are inherently insecure, are subject to tampering and hacking, and often do not include a paper record of votes that can be used for recounts or audits.

Although this debate has been hotly fought in courts, legislative chambers and editorial pages for months, the Poneman study found that stories of potential problems with e-voting have made little impact on the public at large.

More than 50 percent of the security professionals said they would be very worried about the potential of system or programming errors, or attempts to influence the results of an election. Ordinary citizens' biggest fear was of declines in voter turnout due to distrust of the machines.

Indeed, 79 percent of ordinary citizens said they believed that e-voting machines would be as accurate or more accurate than traditional paper balloting.

Despite the seeming confidence of regular citizens, the deep discomfort of some computer professionals was a bad sign for ultimate confidence in the machines, according to at least one e-voting critic. Harvard-affiliated researcher Rebecca Mercuri said professionals' distrust of the machines could filter down to the general public as more attention is paid to the issue.

"The general perception of voters that their votes may not be counting or that something might be wrong with the election equipment is very important," Mercuri said.

At last week's Black Hat USA 2004 Briefings and Training conference in Las Vegas, Mercuri called on would-be hackers to try to find the flaws in e-voting systems. She pointed to the $10,000 reward offered by e-voting proponent Michael Shamos, a Carnegie Mellon University computer scientist, to anyone who can successfully tamper undetectably with a voting machine.


аRelated Links:
> E-voting critic calls on hackers to expose flaws
> Court refuses to lift California e-voting restrictions
> Feds want e-voting source code disclosed
> High hopes for unscrambling the vote
> Fight over e-voting leaves election plans as casualties




Add Your Opinion

аTalkBack: Post your comment here
Click on a top-level comment to explore tree а(7аtotal replies - 0 NEW )
This will be the death of democracyаJeff Spicoliа--а08/03/04
E-voters...аKOS-MOSа--а08/03/04
Ignorance is bliss...аAlpha_Femaleа--а08/04/04




Notebook is preloaded with SuSE Linux and OpenOffice.org productivity suite

Halsey Minor: "Services will replace software."

Wireless interoperability in focus at Sun Labs
WEI
Eight myths about using business apps online

COOPER
Microsoft: Always pushing people over the edge

FARBER
Software delivered as a network

Study: Americans happier with their PCs
05:46PM
'Plays for sure' means Microsoft's inside
05:45PM
Newisys paves way for 16-, 32-chip Opteron servers
05:03PM
Digital attacks on Winamp use 'skins' for camouflage
04:36PM
Microsoft expands mainframe pitch
04:26PM
Dual-core chips bring dual caches
04:13PM
Justice Dept. probes for pirates
03:44PM
More...

TECH UPDATE TODAY DAILY:
Dan Farber and David Berlind deliver daily insights on the business and technology news that matters to enterprise IT.


Enterprise Alerts
Surveys
Computers: Desktops & Laptops
IT Management
Security
IT Professionals

Manage My Newsletters


Helpа|аAdvertisementsа|аFeedbackа|аReprintsа|аNewsletters
News Tech Update White Papers Downloads Reviews & Prices